As you may have heard, Congress has brought a big step toward banning most online gambling.
Rather than attempting to outlaw gambling sites, which may be impossible to complete since almost all are outside of the US, they are trying to make processing or handling payments illegal. The result, gamblers wouldn’t be able to use charge cards, debit cards, as well as make direct transfers from US bank accounts to fund their accounts.
Supporters of the ban claim the Internet’s widespread availability makes it too simple to gamble and creates betting addictions and financial problems.
Internet gambling sites are estimated to take in $12 billion annually. 1 / 2 of this $12 billion comes from gamblers in the US. Critics of this proposed law เกมยิงปลาฟรีเครดิต argued that regulating a and collecting taxes could be more effective than outlawing it. Prohibition didn’t benefit alcohol. It won’t benefit gambling.
The federal government had a way to regulate online gambling and take advantage of the tax revenue. A current study estimates Internet poker alone, if regulated and taxed, could net the government $3.3 billion each year.
But instead they’ve turned the financial institutions in to the police. They also propose to boost the maximum penalty for violations from two to five years in prison.
Both Republican representatives who sponsored the bill, Bob Goodlatte of Virginia and Jim Leach of Iowa managed to slip in exemptions for the horse racing industry and state lotteries. Not really fair allowing online lotteries and Internet betting on horse racing while cracking down on other kinds of sports betting, casino games and card games like poker.
In several countries the federal government has chosen to regulate online gambling rather than ban it. It’s far more practical and besides, it’s an application of recreation for a lot of people.
Fortunately you can find still some thinking congressmen in Washington who’ve doubts in regards to the bill’s effectiveness and have gone in terms of to call it a feel-good little bit of legislation. A bill more about news-making than lawmaking.
A more effective approach would be to allow a to come to the United States and regulate it. This can be a situation everyone who is or has gambled online may wish to watch on.